|
|
Post by Jim on Feb 13, 2010 21:32:13 GMT -5
Interesting and a must see.... Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by bricklayer on Apr 4, 2011 15:55:36 GMT -5
Free for All Welfare Grant Programs Hurt Our Nation's Most Vulnerablewww.associatedcontent.com/article/291306/free_for_all_welfare_grant_programs.htmlIn the Social Security Act you are finding more and more programs that lack proper eligibility requirements to protect the funding source for our nations elderly and needy. Currently, the government imposes a 12.4% tax on the first $94,200 in income earned by every worker in the United States to contribute to the Social Security Fund. Programs that lack eligibility requirements therefore are fully funded by the United States tax payer well beyond the needy populations the programs were originally intended for.... One such program that lacks any eligibility requirements that provides federal block grant funding to the various states that participate in both Title IV-A, Formerly AFDC, (Cash Assistance and TANF) and a Child Support Enforcement Program, is Title IV-D2. The Title IV-Dwelfare programs that are voluntarily operated by the various states have forced the inclusion of the middle-class and upper-class into the various programs to ensure high paybacks by the federal government.... Grant programs are being used for revenue generation by the states as opposed to solving legitimate societal problems. By placing necessary eligibility restrictions on free-for-all welfare grant programs by the various States that are participating in voluntary Title IV-D welfare programs, we will immediately control spending....
|
|
|
|
Post by bricklayer on Apr 4, 2011 16:16:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bricklayer on Apr 5, 2011 9:02:48 GMT -5
BILL LANGUAGEPayments to States for Child Support Enforcement and Family Support Programs"For making payments to States or other non-Federal entities under titles I, IV-D, X, XI, XIV, and XVI of the Social Security Act and the Act of July 5, 1960, $3,571,509,000, to remain available until expended; and for such purposes for the first quarter of fiscal year 2011, $1,100,000,000, to remain available until expended." www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/olab/budget/2010/FY2010ConferBillLang_508.pdfNational Debt = National Deathadask.wordpress.com/2011/04/09/national-debt-causes-national-death/Color of Law defacto administrative private for profit, and masquerading around as dejure government Law, Government, via individual oaths, to act in commerce is constitutionaly bound judicially, to promote and protect inalienable rights... anything else is treason, criminal; Whereas dejure tort law requires corpus delicti or some other breach of bilateral agreement; universal contract law purely signatory in nature, civil. framedfathers.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=cstheuglytruth&action=display&thread=1598
|
|
|
|
Post by bricklayer on Aug 12, 2011 10:57:07 GMT -5
www.suijurisforum.com/post7052.html#p7052  There are currently efforts at the Federal Level to reverse specific provisions of the Budget Deficit Reduction Act of 2005. Some of the provisions include reopening a funding loophole that allowed local child support enforcement agencies to use federal incentive money instead of their own money as... Title IV-D / Child Support Enforcement agencies are the driving factor for the creation of a non-custodial parent and the creation of a child support order. 2006 Final Version of this Legislation Changes to (CSE) Child Support Enforcement programs included in... S. 1932, the Deficit Reduction Act. Quoting: David Camp, Congressman Hint: download response letter containing above quote here:  http://www.suijurisforum.com/post7052.html#p7052 Action Requested,"We want to contact each of the members of the Sub Committee on Income Security and Family Support and let them know that we do not agree with States being able to use the Title IV-D / Child Support Enforcement Program as a tool for State Revenue Generation instead of Aid for Actual Needy Families." www.laryholland.com/campaign1/
|
|
|
|
Post by bricklayer on Apr 17, 2013 6:13:28 GMT -5
Michigan Analysis, "Michigan is a fairly centralized state, and local governments depend heavily on state grants..." freedominthe50states.org/overall/michiganMichigan relies heavily on Federal Grants, Title IV-D grant contracts at the county level (corporate welfare purported to be child welfare) keeping the local county governments afloat; welfare fraud when taking into consideration Title IV-D incentives, Partnerships, and Stake Holders; together separating families, and children from a parent and or parents. Child Support "congressional intent" was originally created as a cost recovery to recoup tax payer money spent on specific welfare services for children whom where willfully abandoned by a parent and or parents and left to rely on government. Now it has become an unconstitutional cost avoidance scam defrauding the tax payer through the Child Welfare Industry (divorce industry); bringing in more money to the county than any other county agency including the sheriff's office. Governmental Child Abuse causing untold damage! Remedy specified in the Act, such as the federal audits
The Federal Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 APPENDIX C vide pages 7, 8, & 11. nc.casaforchildren.org/files/public/community/judges/March_2011/Edwards_3.pdf The effectiveness of impact litigation has been seriously limited by the United States Supreme Court decision in Suter Vs. Artist M, which held that private persons may not enforce the Act's "reasonable efforts" provision either under the Act itself or under 42 U.S.C. section 1983. Thus the children and families in Suter who sued the social service agency for its failure to provide caseworkers to children in a timely manner were without a remedy except those specified in the Act, such as the federal audits described infra. |
|
