|
Post by Harrison on Apr 10, 2011 10:38:25 GMT -5
I knew you'd love this...... The Becca law works kinda like a competency in that it starts out civil and turns criminal and the court must take jurisdiction first and foremost. After an order of jurisdiction is put forth the family faces all kinds of sanctions at the whim of the court and/or the PA. But an order has been made and as judge Bob stated "Every one has the RIGHT to appeal EVERY decision." That is his emphasis. So an order is made and there for appeal able. Contempt as any one whom as ever meet with child support laws knows is the beginning of criminal charges. As such all due process rights apply, disclosure, comes to mind. I was talking to the "right" people, same office different name. In retrospect: The court officers did push to have the show cause hearing right then. But a day or two of experience has shown me that when the court wants it fast, YOUR RIGHTS WILL BE PAYING FOR THAT EXSEEDEACNE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Well I did it! Made Jim scratch his brain. Not an easy task!!!! Thanks for your insight and all you do for us!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 10, 2011 11:12:09 GMT -5
OH!!! That's good !!! Didn't know I could. Sandy will be receiving a call Mon. Thanks a bunch. They have no intention of making the transcripts. I did however get a CD and have a recording that I will try to submit at the hearing, which should be admissible due to the lack of disclosure and violation of court order. Hmmm one may want call that contempt, gaully, by definition it is
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 13, 2011 11:19:39 GMT -5
Called Sandy (appeals court clerk) and she could do nothing to help directly, but she did help. The Supreme courts decision on my indigency has absolutely nothing to do with the order for indigency already on file at the court house and in criminal cases such as contempt they can NOT with hold evidence used for defence for ANY reason. So no matter how Ms. court admin. wants to slice or spin it she was wrong, wrong, WRONG!!! While talking to Sandy I said "That court house in town has violated nearly every right we have, this shouldn't surprise me.' Her reply sure did shock me!! "Your right on every account, I've read the paper work and I can't see any reason why the supreme won't let you proceed with the appeal. Don't let them discourage you, at this point it harder to find one of your rights they haven't violated, not to mention, a court order for the transcripts I'm looking at right now that is a month and a half old. Just keep going your the one on solid ground." I'm glad she doesn't give legal advice! I think the with holding of evidence was her BS breaking point. Still not a word from what this court calls defence counsel and I doubt we will even hear from her until we're sitting in court.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 13, 2011 20:57:28 GMT -5
Just keep at it, sounds like you may get somewhere and they may be getting tired of you lol!!!! ...and most of the orders done against me were obtained through illegal and uncostitutional means, its just the way they operate......attorneys are the worst when it comes to manipulating the facts, and manipulating the judges.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 16, 2011 0:56:45 GMT -5
Some how the bench did not get a copy of my mtion. Tom was charged with contempt. WOrnder lAnd. Judge Bob held fast to the sprite of the law!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 16, 2011 11:37:26 GMT -5
Summary judgement No. 3 side stepped, nothing to do with the judge, but there were two officers of the court sitting there with the doc. that said nothing. I think I'll be making an appointment with the lead judge come Mon. morn. I'd like to talk to judge Bob, but he is a party to the case and to his honer will not discuss it out side the court room. But judge Sheldon, the lead judge, should know what's going on in her court house and given the opportunity to clean house before the justice department is called to do it for her. I'll be making that point! I did some paper work for a friend on a DV charge. Out of all the judges involved she was the ONLY one that recognized the clean hands doct. and dismissed on thoughts grounds alone. I believe her to be just. I don't want to get judge Bob in trouble, even thought he had Tom in his sights he ruled with justice in one hand and liberty in the other. He just needs more time to be a real great judge. I know the clerk filed that motion I watched her do it and she is the only one in that office that is worth a damn. She very good at her job!!! So who had motive and opportunity to make that motion disappear?
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 16, 2011 11:57:17 GMT -5
Yep, thought it over. Mon. morning I'll be the first one through the court house doors and straight to the court adminastration. "I need to see judge Sheldon NOW!!! She can either see me now or the justice department later." I will cause a public spectical, she will see me!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 17, 2011 9:57:54 GMT -5
? CAFR? More please
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Apr 17, 2011 18:13:40 GMT -5
Summary judgement No. 3 side stepped, nothing to do with the judge, but there were two officers of the court sitting there with the doc. that said nothing. I think I'll be making an appointment with the lead judge come Mon. morn. I'd like to talk to judge Bob, but he is a party to the case and to his honer will not discuss it out side the court room. But judge Sheldon, the lead judge, should know what's going on in her court house and given the opportunity to clean house before the justice department is called to do it for her. I'll be making that point! I did some paper work for a friend on a DV charge. Out of all the judges involved she was the ONLY one that recognized the clean hands doct. and dismissed on thoughts grounds alone. I believe her to be just. I don't want to get judge Bob in trouble, even thought he had Tom in his sights he ruled with justice in one hand and liberty in the other. He just needs more time to be a real great judge. I know the clerk filed that motion I watched her do it and she is the only one in that office that is worth a damn. She very good at her job!!! So who had motive and opportunity to make that motion disappear? Now doesn't that about figure? sheesh!
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Apr 21, 2011 11:50:14 GMT -5
Well, got a letter, the PD had the next hearing moved to May 6th. I guess that's good? The supreme court rules on my indigence Apr. 26, then a date is set for a hearing by the court of appeals. I guess it is a good thing!!! I'm waiting the 10 days and appealing the conviction of contempt and the 26th is the magic 11th day to get it out of this court house. With any luck I can file First thing and get back home and get the new appeal in the file for the indigency hearing. That should get some attention? Oh yes, and I talked to the lead judges' secretary, it would seem I have the attention of the hole court house. She asked if this was the case that had been appealed and when I said yes, holy shit! I couldn't get a straight honest answer out of her, and she wanted no more to do with me and would in no way make an appointment for me to see the judge. So it would seem I am making an impact. Who investigates the court house? The justice department or ?? I'd like to give the prosecutors and the court house some balls, just to see how well they can juggle.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on May 3, 2011 10:23:06 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Jim on May 3, 2011 16:04:28 GMT -5
Whats going on brother?
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on May 3, 2011 19:52:34 GMT -5
No appeal I don't have the cash We will show FRI. Won't be back!!
|
|
|
Post by wargames102 on May 4, 2011 9:30:32 GMT -5
Hey Secretary... extract and abort this board/site. Nothing left to see here... I offered (for free) it' declined!
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on May 4, 2011 9:47:29 GMT -5
WTF does that mean? What ever, poke the pissed on bear, wise move. Still one last date and I will be using my 1st amend. right, like it or not Judge Bob and the rest of the court will hear ALL of rights their court have violated. At least it will be on record. If I have got to come up with the cash, why fuck around, put another C note in the pot and file federal.
|
|