|
Post by Jim on Feb 28, 2009 10:46:09 GMT -5
Thanks to DadsRites for emailing me this.....
|
|
|
Post by Barbara on Mar 6, 2009 14:29:22 GMT -5
The post Majority child support laws in Massachusetts over age 18 is unfair do to no one makes married couple's pay it.According to Chief Justice Paula M. Carey....theres no state intervention in cases who are married Wouldn't this be discrimination or a violation of our rights?What can we do its making criminals of otherwise law abiding citizens. in this economy its hard enough to take care of normal family life and bills never mind the interest and penalties DOR/CSE adds on. In this case all states should be the same. Mass doesn't pay for there state kids or foster kids. so why should divorced parents after age 18 unless we choose to? >
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Dec 8, 2010 13:11:51 GMT -5
The IV-D program is grounded in both federal and state statutes as well as judicial rules and procedures. The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) within the Department of Health & Human Services of each state is the single state agency charged with administering the IV- D program in the respective states. The federal statutory basis for the program is U.S. Public Law 93-647, Title IV-D of the Social Security Act. Each state has a similar state statutory basis.
The policies and procedures that govern most aspects of the child support program in each state are the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) in 45 CFR, Parts 232 and 301 to 308; state child support statutes; and state Rules of Court. Additionally, existing policies and procedures may be affected by case law as well as court and judicial proceedings.
No where in the Code of Federal Regulations or Federal Child Support statutes (42 U.S.C. Sections 659-671) does it allow for the incarceration/imprisonment of anyone for child support debts.
|
|