|
|
Post by Jim on Nov 20, 2009 9:10:45 GMT -5
The U.S. Supreme Court Troxel v Granville (2000), said, the Due Process Clause of the Constitution does not permit a State to infringe on the fundamental right of parents to make childrearing decisions simply because a state judge believes a “better” decision could be made. Yet, this is exactly how many family court judges issue rulings. Attachments:
|
|
|
|
Post by Isaac on Jun 29, 2015 9:23:22 GMT -5
States are alleging that they cannot afford to pay for representation, yet they have created a statutory code in order for the state to profit and public and private employers. There are class actions popping up in Georgia and I am working on another. Fathers are paying federal and state taxes and these taxpayer dollars are being used through Title_IV-D in order to subsidize the states. Mothers are being provided the best counsel that our taxpayer dollars can buy to be used against us as fathers and the state is telling us we do not have a right to counsel. They are also preempting federal criminal statutes that forbid Forced Labor- Peonage-Involuntary servitude. Title 18 USC! Fathers are being forced to work under threat of jail after their child support has been established. This is not "AT WILL' employment. While incarcerated the states are using this time in order to charge the father with arrears plus interest. This includes injury, sickness, unemployed. We have got to stop the corruption!
|
|
