|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 3, 2010 13:25:22 GMT -5
10 days from today!! The excitement is boiling already!@!!!
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 4, 2010 12:33:24 GMT -5
This is what the GAL had to say in her report Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 4, 2010 12:35:48 GMT -5
Page #2 Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 4, 2010 12:40:19 GMT -5
Page #3 I like how it states that I am an abusive husband and she is scared of me That's why I have raised her 4 children myself for 8 yrs. Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 4, 2010 12:42:02 GMT -5
Page #4 Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 4, 2010 12:43:16 GMT -5
And the last Page #5 Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Aug 5, 2010 12:24:39 GMT -5
And there you have it Bryan!! the last line on the last page. The GAL's recommendation is that the court order a genetic testing. Before your next hearing file a declaration deaning and objecting to any form of domestic violence. Even though the statue of limitations is up, CPS can still use these accusations as cause for an investigation of the safety of your daughter. They're so far in the wrong that they may well try a CPS kid theft to keep you spinning' at the end of the string. So after your denial statement the objection should be simple "facts not in evidence and (LITTLE HELP ON WORDING!!) not material to case at hand? Any way on the 13th your headed for a hearing that should be about enough to drive you crazy. The commissioner will more than likely keep you on the CS hook until genetic testing can be done, because it's your ex's sole income is the stolen CS and state statue requires it. NO MATTER HOW ASSININE THIS SEEMS BE QUITET AND LET THEM DO IT!!!!! Do not point out the fact you've been making that motion for years and that it's law for contested paternity. Ask the commissioner when the test is to be done, that will set a time limit so the ex can't drag it out. If the commissioner will not order the testing and pulls some dumb ass ruling, sign no agreements. Take the ruling and appeal to superior court, cause these idiots are trashing your civil rights Hope your derby was a smashing success!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 5, 2010 23:15:29 GMT -5
Chances are she will pull another no show to this next hearing. I am hoping the judge will honor his previous statement when he stated if she fails to show it will be dismissed. I am just tired of being labeled as a dead beat dad by the state to everyone. I work my butt off to feed and house my children every day of my life it is hard enough trying to do it as a single father. With the state it is as if there is simply zero I mean ABSOLUTELY ZERO care at all in the world that they are destroying a families life to get what they want! I know they do not need my money that bad. I believe they get some sort of sick enjoyment out of destroying people. That's enough of that!! The Derby trucks are the same day as the trial The schedule is like this; I must have the Derby truck at the compex in the morning, Make a dash down to the court house ready by 9:00am, Back to the fair in the truck ready to Demolish others by 2:00pm, One thing for sure is the truck derby will be a good way to get frustrations out after the court date
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Aug 7, 2010 11:37:17 GMT -5
Oh man, you don't want a dismissal, that wouldn't fix a thing and put you back at the start line. That commissioner needs to make a ruling good or bad. Derby therapy.........Hmmm has a ring. The ex giving you a hard time, the answer is no longer mediation or family court. It's derby therapy..........
|
|
|
Post by presumeddad on Aug 7, 2010 14:59:22 GMT -5
Dismissal not good?? But why not? Then it is over right?
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Aug 8, 2010 12:16:46 GMT -5
Dismissal is dropping the hole thing, like if you where to file the wrong paper work that has nothing to do with what your trying to accomplish. The judge would dismiss the case and tell you to seek legal counsel and try again. If the ex is a no show you'll be looking for a DEFAULT JUDGEMENT. If the judge in this go around doesn't make a judgement, for what ever reason, you will need to file a motion for SUMMARY JUDGEMENT that will put him on the spot, to make a ruling. Until he makes a judgement your stuck in a holding pattern at kangaroo court and as you've seen they will keep you going aroundy-round as long as possible. You may want motion for summary judgement Mon.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Aug 11, 2010 8:17:14 GMT -5
Definantly need some form of default judgement written and signed by the judge on the spot that day, with the language in it to satisfy your efforts relating to the goals that you have been working towards to some extent.
Like Harrison says, motion the court for this judgment and have want you want in the judgment included in the motion. It wouldn't hurt for sure if you actually had an order that you want drafted up so the judge can just sign it that day and doesn't have to write it himself. He can always deny it and tell you that he'she will write one, but most often they are too damn lazy to do anything themselves and it might be a good move on your part........ I am not all that familiar though with your case and state your in as Harrison is though, whatcha think Harrison?
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Aug 11, 2010 13:07:31 GMT -5
Great thinkin' Jim!!!! Although, I'll bet the "judge" orders genetic testing because of the statues sited by the GAL. I called B. and he's going to motion for a summery judgement on the grounds that he has already proved his case and genetic testing will not change facts already in evidence. B.s' biggest problem is his ex's continuing failure to appear and evasion of the courts orders. If any of us guys pulled BS like that they'd start us out with a 5 year tour of the gray box motel and then make a federal case of it. 13 times to court and the state knows whom the father is and the kicker is the mother has not said any different. It's all on the state, old man Washington has got to be flipping in his grave like a flap jack!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Aug 11, 2010 22:42:32 GMT -5
I've been following along with the correspondence about this case and I must say, it is one of the rather more ridiculous ones I've seen lately. There is really absolutely no reason for this to be dragged out like it has, it's just amazing how pathetic these things work. Talk about double standards and injustice, my gosh, this stuff shouldn't even be happening in our courts.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Aug 11, 2010 22:43:24 GMT -5
This case should of been closed within one or two hearings....
|
|