|
Post by Harrison on May 6, 2011 12:45:33 GMT -5
Just tried to take a look at Tom's grades and attendance record with family access. He has been removed without a trace. Hmmm....Well we're off to the court of oppresion. Let's see if they can violate one last right befor I sue the shit out of them.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Jun 9, 2011 10:17:35 GMT -5
Got a courts notice rescheduling hearing from tomorrow to Sept. 16. It's filed the 7th, but some how the US mail made it hear by the 8th. It's not signed by any sort of judge. I believe we will be making a stop by the court house in the morning, It can't be a coincidence that something goes awry every time I file a motion.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 18, 2011 9:26:58 GMT -5
Becoming the never ending story huh Harrison? Sheesh, these courts tie people up for months, sometimes yrs for some of the most ridiculous reasons......or should I say "gestapo"?
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Jun 19, 2011 13:17:01 GMT -5
My motion was filed at about 10 am and the court notice after 4 pm Hmmmm. Here's my question, can I file suit against the school and county in superior court? It would seem to be my only option having been denied appeal, due process and constitutional rights. Or do I have to wait until this Kanga court releases jurisdiction? The law in on case shall the order expire before the end of the school year it is entered. This case should be over, there was no order for it to go further
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 20, 2011 7:10:22 GMT -5
My motion was filed at about 10 am and the court notice after 4 pm Hmmmm. Here's my question, can I file suit against the school and county in superior court? It would seem to be my only option having been denied appeal, due process and constitutional rights. Or do I have to wait until this Kanga court releases jurisdiction? The law in on case shall the order expire before the end of the school year it is entered. This case should be over, there was no order for it to go further Seems to me that if it went to appeal and was denied by the appeals court the case should be closed as appeal is the final process of any case (supposivly) I'm not absolutely sure though as these people can do about anything they want to, when they want to. You may want to write Roberta about this as she may have some insight to FERPA procedures and rules applying to this case since it doesn't seem to go anywhere in regular courts....it may be a federal situation at this point.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Jun 20, 2011 9:40:21 GMT -5
It didn't get to appeal, the supreme court denied my indegance. So they denied my right to appeal. Your soooo right! The law and the rule of the land be damned. I've seen this unfold in way's I couldn't have thought possible. Over a problem the school started.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Aug 3, 2011 13:05:01 GMT -5
So, now that the right to appeal has evaporated. I ponder what could possibly be my next step? I felt like showing the courthouse what WE THE PEOPLE was all about. Seemed a little harsh over a truancy, but our rights are our right!!! And beating them at there own game was the goal. So I started with a web search on how to file suite against a government entity. There was no readily available material on this subject. So I sat down and read RCW 4 civil procedure from start to finish. It was an interesting read and had a surprise ending one that is at best terrifying. In Washington State it seems that our legislature has decided that the total concept of the U.S.A. has become far too bothersome and quietly passed RCW 4.92 & 4.96. These two statues make it illegal for you to bring a legal action directly against the state or any governing body (county, city, etc.). As a matter of fact the state has a brand new department of risk management. This is hardly a state department it is an insurance company and any claim of damage must first be filed with the office that represents the governing body that one wishes to file against. Your are to submit all evidence with them and they will adjudicate the matter, not a word about a hearing or anything. It's up to them and them alone, no checks, no balances, no rights. If you don't agree with their decision then you can file in court to start the process constitutional grant you in the first place. I'll play their game, but damn I really feel like giving them the right and ability to remain silent. Oh, the state is straightforward about were you need to start, but the local county or city risk management office may not be so easy to track down. Each dept. has it's own form that may ask anything they like, but you are only required to answer the information required by these RCW's, not that the forms tell what is required. BEST OF LUCK ON THOSE SUMMER PROJECTS
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Aug 7, 2011 18:35:20 GMT -5
can you say, "dragged through the mud......slowly?" The only way you can beat these criminals is finding dirt on them and blackmailing them or paying them off somehow....the deck is majorly stacked against us, plus they hide aces and wild cards up their sleeves too. We must learn to be like them to a certain degree to even have a chance to trump their aces with a wild card.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Nov 23, 2011 13:01:55 GMT -5
This case started at the begging of this school year on the first day when Tom attempted to have his schedule changed to classes, required and needed to graduate with his class. The school having denied him required classes on a regular basis left him with the need for a particular schedule. He spent all of September trying to accomplish this goal to no avail. At the end of the month the school simply denied his repeated requests saying it was too late in the semester to change his schedule. In total exasperation Tom quite attending Shelton High School in search of an alternative education. I (his parent) insisted that Tom obtain a GED before going to job corps. or other alternative schooling. Only to find that the principal of the high school must give her written permission before the GED test can be taken. I then tried to make contact by phone a multitude of times, this was ineffective. I tried to make appointments but was told by the person that makes the appointments that she didn’t know the principals schedule and couldn’t make an appointment. I then went and sat in the office for over 4 hrs. But it seems even though she was on school grounds she didn’t have time to waist on a troubled student or their parent. I finally E-mailed her, but to this day she will not acknowledge my existence. The Shelton School Dist. does NOT have the right to interfere with a parent and child’s educational choices as per many U.S. Supreme Court rulings. In this truancy case there has been many breaches of rights, procedure and law. Starting with the schools pre-filing requirements that mandate a change to the student’s schedule for the purpose of attendance. After filling the prosecuting attorneys office did not prefect service of process, I then filled a motions for dismissal. Dec.10, 2010 the date of the first hearing, the proceedings took place without our right to be present and our right to be heard as can be attested to by the summary judgment motion filed on Dec.3, 2010 and the transcripts from Dec.10th in which the prosecuting attorney (PA) Jason Richards states that a motion for dismissal on grounds of lack of and insufficiency of service of process had been filed and we were in the hall. In the collusion between the commissioner Richard Adamson and PA Jason Richards there was neither a motion made nor an order given. After the collusion Jason Richards came in to the hall and told me I could leave. I refused and tried to exercise my right to be heard. Jason Richards then threatened me with imprisonment. It may also be noted that there was not a public defense attorney (PD) present for the students at this initial hearing as ordered by the Washington State Court of Appeals. Dec.15, 2010 another summary judgment motions for dismissal was filed by my self, sighting lack of jurisprudence. This included a still insufficient service of process and the total lack of due process that occurred on Dec. 10. Dec.17, 2010 before being heard we meet the PD attorney Martha Trupp whom had been appointed to Tom. During our conciliation she opened her file on Tom and I noticed a single piece of paper that was Tom’s attendance record. I then informed her of the two motions on file and the hearing that had excluded the respondents, but she made no effort for disclosure. In the hearing of Dec. 17th the commissioner Richard Adamson states that our rights had not been violated due to a continuance, yet there was not a motion or order filed for said action. He then goes on to poorly describe the compulsory attendance law and while doing so states that we were keep out side of the court room during the Dec. 10th hearing. The commissioner in an on going attempt to avoid due process and state law then took jurisdiction when we stipulated the required number of days had been met. No other evidence was submitted as required by the attendance law. Apr. 1, 2011 an attendance hearing was held and the school moved for a contempt hearing sighting that a doctors excuse was mandatory due to the number of days missed through out the year. This sanction made by the school not only was done without notification, but also uses absentees already adjudicated. There in exposing Tom to double jeopardy. Apr. 8, 2011 I filed evidence and a 3rd summary judgment motion for dismissal, sighting lack of jurisdiction. While in the clerks office I asked for a copy of the transcripts of Dec. 10th and 17th that had been ordered with a finding of indecency on Mar. 1, 2011. I was asked to wait for a court administrative representative. While waiting I observed the court clerk filing the newly submitted documents. Upon arrival in the clerk’s office the court administrator informed me that I would have to pay for the transcripts. I promptly referred her to the order of indecency. I also informed her that the transcripts were evidence in an up coming show cause hearing. Her excuses for with holding evidence changed continually even going as far as saying we had to wait for the supreme court ruling on my indecency, a court that carried no jurisdiction in this case. My request for evidence has yet to be fulfilled as per ordered by commissioner Bob Sauerlender. Apr. 15, 2011 at the show cause hearing Tom was found in contempt and again a properly filed motion went unheard. Upon inquiry as to why the motion was not heard the presiding court officer Bob Sauerlender stated that there was no such motion before him. He was then made aware of the motion. As I previously stated I witnessed the clerk properly and expediently file the evidence and motion, but only the evidence remained in the court file at the time of the show cause hearing. It should beg the question, why was the hearing allowed to continue when there were two other officers of the court each having been served a copy of the summary judgment motion. It was the duty of both councilors as officers of the court to bring the motion to the attention of the bench. June 7, 2011 I refilled the previous motion for the hearing set for 10th of June, 6 hours and 3 minute later the clerks office filled a court’s notice rescheduling hearing due to congestion moving the hearing to Sept. 16, 20011. I can not prove Tom was signaled out in this action for auspicious reasons, but then again I can not get documents ordered by commissioner Sauerlender. Nov. 9, 2011 I received a copy of a disciplinary referral from Marilynn Harris at Shelton High, it states “Be at school or make other educational arrangements.” I would hope I do not have to point out the madding hypocrisy in this statement. Nov. 12, 2011 Notice of hearing of contempt set for Dec. 2, 2011 came in the mail. I would like to file a motion for dismissal due to fraud on the court, but it’s obvious that our legal and civil rights will be subverted. Having been denied the recourse of appeal we will no longer will participate in unconstitutional and illegal proceedings. Shelton High and the court have damaged our father/son relationship, undermined Toms the respect for the rights, laws and judicial system of this country and its people. My faith in the local court system has been destroyed and I will be interested in what a higher court has to say on this matter of unethical and criminal treatment and behavior.
Draft 1, What ya think?
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Nov 23, 2011 14:12:08 GMT -5
Refresh my mind again, who is this letter directed to?
There's quite a few typos and to me its hard to understand, but they know whats going on and I don't know the details like they and you do, they will know what your talking about.
Also, I imagine you know that if they will illegally ignore motions and proper procedure, that they will surely most likely ignore this letter too, but anything is possible. Perhaps another angle is all you can strive for. Perhaps contacting the judicial commission of your state and filing complaints against the officials who have violated their oath of office, ethics, and proper procedure would be the next step to take....and make these idiots aware of exactly what you are going to do within this letter.
I personally think the letter is a bit long, but this is your call. Regardless I would file this letter and have it a part of the case file and send everyone involved in this case a copy of it.
RE: They can lock you and or your son up for ignoring this contempt hearing, they obviously think they are above and beyond the law, I would be careful if I were you, they don't seem to give a shit about how they proceed or handle proper and legal procedures and statutes/state code.
I'll help you more with this if you want me too, let me know.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Nov 23, 2011 15:56:50 GMT -5
It's aimed at every court officer and county official involved. As far as the length... it will be a year and 4 mo. come Dec. of consistent misconduct on the part of the school and court. Oh it's rough alright. I'll smooth it up and them we can put a shine to it, THANKS
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Nov 23, 2011 18:17:36 GMT -5
Sorry. I cut short my last post. As far as the issue of jail. I'll risk it. Tom turns 18 Jan. 22. A month and a half on the lamb dodging the people who could not manage to send a certified letter. Hell, they want nothing to do with a criminal contempt they would have to provide me legal counsel and they would be hard pressed to find an attorney that would accept the fact they worked for me. From this trip through the looking glass I've learned.......wait for it,,,,,,,JURISDICTION, JURISDICTION, JURISDICTION!!!!!! Thanks again Framed !! I'll mail to ya
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Jan 7, 2012 17:22:51 GMT -5
This case started at the begging of the 2010 school year on the first day when Tom attempted to have his schedule changed to classes, required and needed to graduate with his class. The school having denied him required classes on a regular basis left him with the need for a particular schedule. He spent all of September trying to accomplish this goal to no avail. At the end of the month the school simply denied his repeated requests saying it was too late in the semester to change his schedule. In total exasperation Tom quite attending Shelton High School in search of an alternative education. I (his parent) insisted that Tom obtain a GED before going to job corps. or other alternative schooling. Only to find that the principal of the high school must give her written permission before the GED test can be taken. I then tried to make contact by phone a multitude of times, this was ineffective. I tried to make personal appointments but was told by the person that makes the appointments that she didn’t know the principals schedule and couldn’t make an appointment. I then went and sat in the office for over 4 hrs. But it seems even though she was on school grounds she didn’t have time to waist on a troubled student or their parent. I finally E-mailed her, but to this day she will not acknowledge my existence. The Shelton School Dist. does NOT have the right to interfere with a parent and child’s educational choices as per U.S. Supreme Court rulings. In this truancy case there has been many breaches of rights, procedure and law. Starting with the schools pre-filing requirements that mandate a change to the student’s schedule for the purpose of attendance. After filling the prosecuting attorneys office did not prefect service of process, I then filled a motions for dismissal. Dec.10, 2010 the date of the first hearing, the proceedings took place without our right to be present and our right to be heard as can be attested to by the summary judgment motion filed on Dec.3, 2010 and the transcripts from Dec.10th in which the prosecuting attorney (PA) Jason Richards states that a motion for dismissal on grounds for lack of and insufficiency of service of process had been filed. In the collusion between the commissioner Richard Adamson and PA Jason Richards there was neither a motion made nor an order given. After the collusion Jason Richards came in to the hall and told me I could leave. I refused and tried to exercise my right to be heard. Jason Richards then threatened me with imprisonment. It may also be noted that there was not a public defense attorney (PD) present for the students at this initial hearing as ordered by the Washington State Court of Appeals. Dec.15, 2010 another summary judgment motions for dismissal was filed by my self, sighting lack of jurisprudence. This included a still insufficient service of process and the total lack of due process that occurred on Dec. 10. Dec.17, 2010 before being heard we meet the PD attorney Martha Trupp whom had been appointed to represent Tom. During our conciliation she opened her file on Tom and I noticed a single piece of paper that was Tom’s attendance record. I then informed her of the two motions on file and the hearing that had excluded the respondents, but she made no effort for disclosure. In the hearing of Dec. 17th the commissioner Richard Adamson states that our rights had not been violated due to a continuance, yet there was not a motion or order filed for said action. He then goes on to poorly describe the compulsory attendance law and while doing so states that we were keep out side of the court room during the Dec. 10th hearing. The commissioner in an on going attempt to avoid due process and state law then took jurisdiction when we stipulated the required number of days had been met. No other evidence was submitted as required by the attendance law. Apr. 1, 2011 an attendance hearing was held and the school moved for a contempt hearing sighting that a doctors excuse was mandatory due to the number of days missed through out the year. This sanction made by the school not only was done without notification, but also uses absentees already adjudicated. There in exposing Tom to double jeopardy. Apr. 8, 2011 I filed evidence and a 3rd summary judgment motion for dismissal, sighting lack of jurisdiction. While in the clerks office I asked for a copy of the transcripts of Dec. 10th and 17th that had been ordered with a finding of indecency on Mar. 1, 2011. I was asked to wait for a court administrative representative. While waiting I observed the court clerk filing the newly submitted documents. Upon arrival in the clerk’s office the court administrator informed me that I would have to pay for the transcripts. I promptly referred her to the order of indecency. I also informed her that the transcripts were evidence in an up coming show cause hearing. Her excuses for with holding evidence changed continually even going as far as saying we had to wait for the supreme court ruling on my indecency, a court that carried no jurisdiction in this case. My request for evidence has yet to be fulfilled as per ordered by commissioner Bob Sauerlender. Apr. 15, 2011 at the show cause hearing Tom was found in contempt and again a properly filed motion went unheard. Upon inquiry as to why the motion was not heard the presiding court officer Bob Sauerlender stated that there was no such motion before him. He was then made aware of the motion. As I previously stated I witnessed the clerk properly and expediently file the evidence and motion, but only the evidence remained in the court file at the time of the show cause hearing. It should beg the question, why was the hearing allowed to continue when there were two other officers of the court each having been served a copy of the summary judgment motion. It was the duty of both councilors as officers of the court to bring the motion to the attention of the bench. June 7, 2011 I refilled the previous motion for the hearing set for the 10th of June, 6 hours and 3 minute later the clerks office filled a court’s notice rescheduling hearing due to congestion moving the hearing to Sept. 16, 20011. I can not prove Tom was signaled out in this action for auspicious reasons, but then again I can not get documents ordered by commissioner Sauerlender. Nov. 9, 2011 I received a copy of a disciplinary referral from Marilynn Harris at Shelton High, it states “Be at school or make other educational arrangements.” I would hope I do not have to point out the madding hypocrisy in this statement. Nov. 12, 2011 Notice of hearing of contempt set for Dec. 2, 2011 came in the mail. I would like to file a motion for dismissal due to fraud on the court, but it’s obvious that our legal and civil rights will be subverted. Having been denied the recourse of appeal we will no longer participate in unconstitutional and illegal proceedings. Shelton High and the court have damaged our father/son relationship, undermined Toms the respect for the rights, laws and judicial system of this country and its people. My faith in the local court system has been destroyed and I will be interested in what a higher court has to say on this matter of unethical and criminal treatment and behavior.
|
|
|
Post by Harrison on Jan 13, 2012 15:57:35 GMT -5
Here's a list of charges/damages done, if you can see more or help me phrase what I have better, please do. 1) Parental interference 2) Child endangerment 3) Failure to meet prefilling requirements 4) Insufficiency of service of process 5) lack of service of process 6) Right to be present 7) Right to be heard 8) right to legal counsel 9) presumption of guilt 10) failure to present evidence 11) double jeopardy 12) With holding evidence 13) Case tampering 14) Ineffective counsel 15) Malicious prosecution
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jan 14, 2012 9:18:32 GMT -5
Here's a list of charges/damages done, if you can see more or help me phrase what I have better, please do. 1) Parental interference 2) Child endangerment 3) Failure to meet prefilling requirements 4) Insufficiency of service of process 5) lack of service of process 6) Right to be present 7) Right to be heard 8) right to legal counsel 9) presumption of guilt 10) failure to present evidence 11) double jeopardy 12) With holding evidence 13) Case tampering 14) Ineffective counsel 15) Malicious prosecution Emotional pain and suffering and duress, especially for your son. These idiots are basically terrorists in my opinion.......
|
|