Post by Jim on Jan 3, 2010 17:40:08 GMT -5
Nice and useful collection of caselaw regarding the fundamental right to travel, and other aspects of law and caselaw relevant to defending against the unconstitutional deprivation of drivers licenses, etc...:
www.liberty4 free.com/ FUNDAMENTAL% 20RIGHT%20TO% 20TRAVEL. htm
Now, that's the latest one to run across my desk, plus there's these other great collections and resources on the same stuff, here (some of these even including sample briefs, etc.):
www.dadsnow. org/html/ legal.htm# Drivers (pay special attention to the 4th one, extracts by David Usher )
www.apfn. org/apfn/ travel.htm
www.theforbi ddenknowledge. com/hardtruth/ driver_licensing .htm
www.usff. com/iepsc/ dlbrief1. html
www.lawfulpa th.com/ref/ right2travel. shtml
www.welcome. freeenterpriseso ciety.com/ right_to_ travel.htm
www.bignewsn etwork.com/ forum/showthread .php?t=53499
www.illidan1 337.net/travel- right/is- your-right- to-travel- by-driving- a-car-prevented- by-the-requirmen t-of-a-drivers- license
www.ojd. state.or. us/osca/opds/ AppellateLegalIs sues/Documents/ ODL%20REVOCATION %20NOTES. pdf
http://piratenews- tv.blogspot. com/2009/ 03/constitutiona l-right-to- travel-without. html
www.michigan .gov/sos/ 0,1607,7- 127-1627_ 8665_9074- 29754--,00. html (Michigan only)
Remember, the MAIN thing to all of this IS that administrative or other suspension of your Driver's License, based SOLELY upon an issue of alleged child support arrears, is an unwarranted or otherwise unconstitutional suspension, regardless of statutory law, because - constitutionally - these two things have *nothing* to do with each other, i.e., there is no legal rational basis, or "nexus", from a civil debt to a suspension of a license which has nothing to do with that debt. Even moreover, the very act and presumption of the State *forcing* such a civil debt as "child support" UPON you, involuntarily, is a prime legal defense against the collateral suspension, itself.. Because a forced contract is NO contract at all, and totally unenforceable by any court, under the well-established common law and caselaw. (Yes, I know they DO do it, but that's only because the proper law has not yet been applied in those cases). Now.. if you have been a naughty drunk driver, for one example, THAT is a completely different story, and just kiss your license goodbye, if they decide to do that..
www.liberty4 free.com/ FUNDAMENTAL% 20RIGHT%20TO% 20TRAVEL. htm
Now, that's the latest one to run across my desk, plus there's these other great collections and resources on the same stuff, here (some of these even including sample briefs, etc.):
www.dadsnow. org/html/ legal.htm# Drivers (pay special attention to the 4th one, extracts by David Usher )
www.apfn. org/apfn/ travel.htm
www.theforbi ddenknowledge. com/hardtruth/ driver_licensing .htm
www.usff. com/iepsc/ dlbrief1. html
www.lawfulpa th.com/ref/ right2travel. shtml
www.welcome. freeenterpriseso ciety.com/ right_to_ travel.htm
www.bignewsn etwork.com/ forum/showthread .php?t=53499
www.illidan1 337.net/travel- right/is- your-right- to-travel- by-driving- a-car-prevented- by-the-requirmen t-of-a-drivers- license
www.ojd. state.or. us/osca/opds/ AppellateLegalIs sues/Documents/ ODL%20REVOCATION %20NOTES. pdf
http://piratenews- tv.blogspot. com/2009/ 03/constitutiona l-right-to- travel-without. html
www.michigan .gov/sos/ 0,1607,7- 127-1627_ 8665_9074- 29754--,00. html (Michigan only)
Remember, the MAIN thing to all of this IS that administrative or other suspension of your Driver's License, based SOLELY upon an issue of alleged child support arrears, is an unwarranted or otherwise unconstitutional suspension, regardless of statutory law, because - constitutionally - these two things have *nothing* to do with each other, i.e., there is no legal rational basis, or "nexus", from a civil debt to a suspension of a license which has nothing to do with that debt. Even moreover, the very act and presumption of the State *forcing* such a civil debt as "child support" UPON you, involuntarily, is a prime legal defense against the collateral suspension, itself.. Because a forced contract is NO contract at all, and totally unenforceable by any court, under the well-established common law and caselaw. (Yes, I know they DO do it, but that's only because the proper law has not yet been applied in those cases). Now.. if you have been a naughty drunk driver, for one example, THAT is a completely different story, and just kiss your license goodbye, if they decide to do that..
